Planning
Planning at contract level where the system showed only totals
Contract-level
Contract-level granularity and full history where the legacy system summed everything into aggregates.
The engagement: existing, as built, in production
Existing
The challenge
The legacy system summed all cash flows into aggregated totals, hiding individual contract performance and blocking sensitivity analysis. Manual spreadsheet dependencies and the limits of a proprietary tool stood in the way of long-term IFRS projections.
As built
What we built
- Planning workflows migrated to Foundry with automated pipelines feeding one source of truth
- Contract-level granularity with full historisation, so every figure is traceable and auditable
- The flexibility to run complex sensitivity scenarios across business units
In production
The impact
- A centralised forecasting platform with modular, scalable workflows
- Decision-makers drill into individual contract flows for sensitivity analysis and cash-flow drivers
- Alignment with evolving IFRS requirements and long-term strategic projections on the same platform
Contract level
where the system showed only totals
The same problem elsewhere
The same granularity applies wherever a system shows only totals: cost per site, per product, per project, per customer.
- Insurance & reinsurance
- Contract-level planning and projections where the legacy tool only ever showed the book in total.
- Manufacturing & engineering
- Cost and margin by product and order where the ERP reports only by plant.
- Logistics & transport
- Profitability by lane, contract and customer where the system aggregates to the region.
- Energy & utilities
- Asset-level cash flows where the planning model shows only the portfolio.
More in Planning
Bring us the version of this you are living
Tell us where your programme stands, and we will say whether the same approach would work for it.
info@ainurinsights.com